Comparison: CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Budget

CST

Medallion MD-A1

R13 – R20

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Medallion MD-A1

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

2

14

10

3

Best position

#10

#8

#2

Average position

21.5

13.4

6.0

3.3

Latest test

2019

2026

Available sizes

264

153

104

40

Wet

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

CST Medallion MD-A1

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Wet braking

CST Medallion MD-A1

29%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

CST Medallion MD-A1

99%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Wet circle cornering

CST Medallion MD-A1

24%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Wet handling

CST Medallion MD-A1

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Dry

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dry handling

CST Medallion MD-A1

95%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dry braking

CST Medallion MD-A1

22%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Costs

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Rolling resistance

CST Medallion MD-A1

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Exterior noise

CST Medallion MD-A1

100%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Medallion MD-A1

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison