18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

CST Medallion MD-A1

CST

Medallion MD-A1

VS

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

CST

Medallion MD-A1

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

2

14

10

Best position

#10

#8

#2

Average position

21.5

13.4

6.0

Latest test

2019

2026

2026

Available sizes

264

153

104

Wet

Wet

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

CST Medallion MD-A1

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Wet braking

CST Medallion MD-A1

29%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

CST Medallion MD-A1

99%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Wet circle cornering

CST Medallion MD-A1

24%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Wet handling

CST Medallion MD-A1

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Dry

Dry

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Dry braking

CST Medallion MD-A1

22%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Dry handling

CST Medallion MD-A1

95%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Costs

Costs

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Rolling resistance

CST Medallion MD-A1

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Comfort

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Exterior noise

CST Medallion MD-A1

100%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison