18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Cooper
Zeon CS8
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
14
1
3
2
Best position
#9
#1
#2
#1
Average position
19.7
1.0
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
145
64
34
23

Wet

Wet
Cooper Zeon CS8
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplaning - cross
Cooper Zeon CS8
79%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Cooper Zeon CS8
84%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet braking
Cooper Zeon CS8
75%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Wet handling
Cooper Zeon CS8
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Wet circle cornering
Cooper Zeon CS8
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%

Dry

Dry
Cooper Zeon CS8
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry braking
Cooper Zeon CS8
59%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Dry handling
Cooper Zeon CS8
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Offroad

Offroad
Cooper Zeon CS8
90%

Costs

Costs
Cooper Zeon CS8
52%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rolling resistance
Cooper Zeon CS8
49%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Cooper Zeon CS8
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison