Comparison: Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Upper-middle

Cooper

Zeon CS8

VS

ION Evo

UltraContact NXT

9.5

R16 – R20

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Zeon CS8

ION Evo

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

14

1

2

Best position

#9

#1

Average position

19.7

1.0

Latest test

2024

2025

Available sizes

145

64

23

Wet

Cooper Zeon CS8

78%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - cross

Cooper Zeon CS8

79%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Cooper Zeon CS8

84%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet braking

Cooper Zeon CS8

75%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet handling

Cooper Zeon CS8

86%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Wet circle cornering

Cooper Zeon CS8

76%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Dry

Cooper Zeon CS8

72%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry braking

Cooper Zeon CS8

59%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry handling

Cooper Zeon CS8

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Offroad

Cooper Zeon CS8

90%

Costs

Cooper Zeon CS8

52%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

Cooper Zeon CS8

49%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Comfort

Cooper Zeon CS8

80%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Cooper Zeon CS8

80%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Zeon CS8

ION Evo

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Offroad

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison