Comparison: Cooper CS7 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

Upper-middle

Cooper

CS7

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

CS7

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

Turanza T005

Number of tests

1

14

10

33

Best position

#15

#8

#2

#1

Average position

15.0

13.4

6.0

4.1

Latest test

2022

2026

2025

Available sizes

71

153

104

658

Wet

Cooper CS7

54%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Wet circle cornering

Cooper CS7

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

85%

Wet handling

Cooper CS7

36%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Cooper CS7

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

73%

Wet braking

Cooper CS7

58%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Dry

Cooper CS7

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Dry braking

Cooper CS7

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Dry driving behavior

Cooper CS7

48%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

85%

Comfort

Cooper CS7

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

76%

Exterior noise

Cooper CS7

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

62%

Interior noise

Cooper CS7

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Cooper CS7 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

CS7

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

Turanza T005

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison