Comparison: Continental VanContact Winter vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Premium

Continental

VanContact Winter

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

VanContact Winter

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

P ZERO PZ4

Number of tests

2

4

3

1

14

Best position

#1

#3

#2

#1

#2

Average position

1.0

12.0

3.3

1.0

5.5

Latest test

2019

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

46

111

40

64

706

Dry

Continental VanContact Winter

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Dry braking

Continental VanContact Winter

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Dry steering response

Continental VanContact Winter

58%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

84%

Dry handling

Continental VanContact Winter

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

Dry lane changing

Continental VanContact Winter

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

85%

Wet

Continental VanContact Winter

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Wet braking

Continental VanContact Winter

94%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Aquaplaning - cross

Continental VanContact Winter

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Wet circle cornering

Continental VanContact Winter

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Continental VanContact Winter

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Wet handling

Continental VanContact Winter

95%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Snow

Continental VanContact Winter

75%

Comfort

Continental VanContact Winter

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Exterior noise

Continental VanContact Winter

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Costs

Continental VanContact Winter

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Mileage

Continental VanContact Winter

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

Rolling resistance

Continental VanContact Winter

43%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

59%

Ice

Continental VanContact Winter

74%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Continental VanContact Winter vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

VanContact Winter

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

P ZERO PZ4

Test Profile

Dry

Wet

Snow

Comfort

Costs

Ice

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison