18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental VanContact Winter vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy

Test Profile

Continental
VanContact Winter
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Number of tests
2
10
4
Best position
#1
#2
#3
Average position
1.0
6.0
12.0
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
Available sizes
46
104
111

Dry

Dry
Continental VanContact Winter
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Dry braking
Continental VanContact Winter
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Dry handling
Continental VanContact Winter
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%

Wet

Wet
Continental VanContact Winter
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Wet braking
Continental VanContact Winter
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental VanContact Winter
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Wet circle cornering
Continental VanContact Winter
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental VanContact Winter
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Wet handling
Continental VanContact Winter
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%

Snow

Snow
Continental VanContact Winter
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental VanContact Winter
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Exterior noise
Continental VanContact Winter
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%

Costs

Costs
Continental VanContact Winter
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Mileage
Continental VanContact Winter
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Rolling resistance
Continental VanContact Winter
43%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%

Ice

Ice
Continental VanContact Winter
74%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison