18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental VanContact Winter vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Continental
VanContact Winter
Falken
EuroWinter VAN01
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
2
1
10
Best position
#1
#6
#2
Average position
1.0
6.0
6.0
Latest test
2019
2019
2026
Available sizes
46
32
104

Dry

Dry
Continental VanContact Winter
62%
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Continental VanContact Winter
72%
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry handling
Continental VanContact Winter
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Wet

Wet
Continental VanContact Winter
94%
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental VanContact Winter
74%
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Wet circle cornering
Continental VanContact Winter
92%
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental VanContact Winter
81%
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet handling
Continental VanContact Winter
95%
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Wet braking
Continental VanContact Winter
94%
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%

Snow

Snow
Continental VanContact Winter
85%
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
48%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental VanContact Winter
75%
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Continental VanContact Winter
65%
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Interior noise
Continental VanContact Winter
77%
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Costs

Costs
Continental VanContact Winter
43%
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rolling resistance
Continental VanContact Winter
43%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Mileage
Continental VanContact Winter
67%
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Ice

Ice
Continental VanContact Winter
74%
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
86%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison