18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental VanContact Winter vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Continental
VanContact Winter
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
2
14
3
Best position
#1
#8
#2
Average position
1.0
13.4
3.3
Latest test
2019
2026
2026
Available sizes
46
153
60

Dry

Dry
Continental VanContact Winter
62%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
Continental VanContact Winter
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
Continental VanContact Winter
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Wet

Wet
Continental VanContact Winter
94%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental VanContact Winter
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet handling
Continental VanContact Winter
95%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet braking
Continental VanContact Winter
94%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental VanContact Winter
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Wet circle cornering
Continental VanContact Winter
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%

Snow

Snow
Continental VanContact Winter
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental VanContact Winter
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
Continental VanContact Winter
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Costs

Costs
Continental VanContact Winter
43%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
Continental VanContact Winter
43%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
Continental VanContact Winter
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Ice

Ice
Continental VanContact Winter
74%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison