18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact NXT
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
2
4
3
Best position
#1
#3
#2
Average position
1.0
12.0
3.3
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
23
111
60

Wet

Wet
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%

Dry

Dry
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Costs

Costs
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison