Comparison: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Continental

UltraContact NXT

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

UltraContact NXT

e.Primacy

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

2

4

1

3

Best position

#1

#3

#1

#2

Average position

1.0

12.0

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

23

111

64

34

Wet

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet side guide

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Wet circle cornering

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry steering response

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry lane changing

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Comfort

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

e.Primacy

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison