18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact NXT
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Number of tests
2
10
4
Best position
#1
#2
#3
Average position
1.0
6.0
12.0
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
23
104
111

Wet

Wet
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Wet handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Wet circle cornering
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%

Dry

Dry
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Dry handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%

Costs

Costs
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Rolling resistance
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison