18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact NXT
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Number of tests
2
10
13
Best position
#1
#2
#2
Average position
1.0
6.0
6.2
Latest test
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
23
104
530

Wet

Wet
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71%
Wet handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Wet circle cornering
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%

Dry

Dry
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Dry handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
72%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%

Costs

Costs
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Rolling resistance
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison