18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact NXT
Kleber
Quadraxer 3
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
2
13
3
Best position
#1
#4
#2
Average position
1.0
6.3
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
23
111
34

Wet

Wet
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
71%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
81%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
64%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
70%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
77%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
72%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kleber Quadraxer 3
78%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison