18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact NXT
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
2
11
18
3
3
Best position
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
1.0
11.6
6.1
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2025
2024
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
23
121
47
34
40

Wet

Wet
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Wet circle cornering
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet side guide
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Dry

Dry
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry lane changing
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%

Costs

Costs
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolling resistance
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison