18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact NXT
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
2
11
3
Best position
#1
#1
#2
Average position
1.0
11.6
3.7
Latest test
2025
2024
2025
Available sizes
23
121
34

Wet

Wet
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet side guide
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Wet circle cornering
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison