18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin e.Primacy

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact NXT
Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
e.Primacy
Number of tests
2
1
4
Best position
#1
#1
#3
Average position
1.0
1.0
12.0
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
23
64
111

Wet

Wet
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Wet handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Wet circle cornering
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%

Dry

Dry
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Dry handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%

Costs

Costs
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Rolling resistance
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison