18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact NXT
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
2
1
3
Best position
#1
#1
#2
Average position
1.0
1.0
3.3
Latest test
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
23
64
40

Wet

Wet
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Wet circle cornering
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%

Dry

Dry
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%

Costs

Costs
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolling resistance
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison