18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
2
3
10
Best position
#1
#2
#2
Average position
1.0
3.3
6.0
Latest test
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
23
40
104

Wet

Wet
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Wet circle cornering
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Dry

Dry
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Costs

Costs
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Rolling resistance
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison