18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
2
3
18
4
1
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#3
#1
Average position
1.0
3.3
6.1
12.0
1.0
Latest test
2025
2026
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
23
40
47
111
64

Wet

Wet
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet side guide
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%

Dry

Dry
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry lane changing
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Costs

Costs
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison