Comparison: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Premium

Continental

UltraContact NXT

VS

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

9.4

R16 – R20

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

Number of tests

2

3

4

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

1.0

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2025

2026

Available sizes

23

34

—

Wet

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Aquaplaning - cross

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Wet handling

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Wet braking

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

97%

Dry

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dry braking

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dry handling

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Comfort

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Exterior noise

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

81%

Costs

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Rolling resistance

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison