18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
2
3
5
Best position
#1
#2
#1
Average position
1.0
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
23
34
63

Wet

Wet
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Dry

Dry
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Costs

Costs
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison