18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact NXT
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
2
14
3
Best position
#1
#8
#2
Average position
1.0
13.4
3.3
Latest test
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
23
153
60

Wet

Wet
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%

Dry

Dry
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%

Costs

Costs
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison