18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact NXT
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
2
14
5
Best position
#1
#8
#1
Average position
1.0
13.4
2.2
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
23
153
63

Wet

Wet
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet circle cornering
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Dry

Dry
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Costs

Costs
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison