18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact NXT
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
2
14
3
Best position
#1
#8
#2
Average position
1.0
13.4
3.7
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
23
153
34

Wet

Wet
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet side guide
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Wet circle cornering
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry steering response
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Dry lane changing
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison