18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental SportContact 7 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
SportContact 7
Firestone
Roadhawk
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
15
21
3
Best position
#1
#2
#2
Average position
1.2
11.9
3.7
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
Available sizes
122
164
34

Wet

Wet
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Continental SportContact 7
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Continental SportContact 7
94%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Continental SportContact 7
97%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry lane changing
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental SportContact 7
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Continental SportContact 7
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%

Costs

Costs
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison