18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental SportContact 6 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
SportContact 6
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
7
14
3
Best position
#1
#8
#2
Average position
2.1
13.4
3.7
Latest test
2021
2026
2025
Available sizes
222
153
34

Wet

Wet
Continental SportContact 6
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Continental SportContact 6
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental SportContact 6
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Continental SportContact 6
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Continental SportContact 6
94%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Continental SportContact 6
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental SportContact 6
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Dry

Dry
Continental SportContact 6
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Continental SportContact 6
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Continental SportContact 6
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry lane changing
Continental SportContact 6
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
Continental SportContact 6
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental SportContact 6
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental SportContact 6
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Continental SportContact 6
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%

Costs

Costs
Continental SportContact 6
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Continental SportContact 6
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison