Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Continental

PremiumContact 7

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

PremiumContact 7

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

26

4

3

Best position

#1

#3

#2

Average position

2.2

12.0

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

66

111

40

60

34

Wet

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet circle cornering

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet side guide

Continental PremiumContact 7

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry braking

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry lane changing

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dry steering response

Continental PremiumContact 7

96%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Costs

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Price/value

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

PremiumContact 7

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison