Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Continental

PremiumContact 7

VS

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 4 S

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Ventus Evo

ION Evo

Number of tests

26

3

5

3

1

Best position

#1

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

2.2

3.3

2.2

3.3

1.0

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

66

40

63

60

64

Wet

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet handling

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry handling

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Costs

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Mileage

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Price/value

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Comfort

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Comfort

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Exterior noise

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Hankook ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Ventus Evo

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison