18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
26
3
14
5
3
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#1
#2
Average position
2.2
3.3
3.6
2.2
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
66
40
188
63
34

Wet

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Wet performance
Continental PremiumContact 7
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Dry

Dry
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry lane changing
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Dry performance
Continental PremiumContact 7
35%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%

Costs

Costs
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison