18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Michelin Primacy 4 vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Firestone Roadhawk

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

In this comparison, we will delve into the details of two summer tyres: the Continental PremiumContact 6 and the Michelin Primacy 4. Both tyres have been well-received in various tests and boast a 90% rating in our evaluation. The PremiumContact 6 replaced the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 while the Primacy 4 replaced the Michelin Primacy 3.


Continental PremiumContact 6 showcased impressive performance in multiple tests. It secured the 2nd position in Promobil, 2nd position in ADAC, and 1st position in Autozeitung. The tyre excelled in various aspects such as wet braking, wet circle cornering, dry braking, and handling, both objectively and subjectively. It was praised for being a well-balanced tyre with no major weaknesses, providing good performance on wet and dry roads, and a low fuel consumption.


On the other hand, the Michelin Primacy 4 also achieved commendable positions in tests, including 1st place in Teknikens and 2nd position in Autozeitung. This tyre demonstrated exceptional performance in dry braking, fuel efficiency, comfort, and wet handling. However, it displayed slight weaknesses on wet roads when put to the test by ADAC, which led to a minor downgrade. Nevertheless, it scored top marks for wear and dry handling.


Comparing their positions in mutual tests, the Continental PremiumContact 6 proved to be the stronger contender, particularly in the wet and overall performance. It provides better wet braking and handling, which are crucial in summer conditions. The Michelin Primacy 4, however, scored higher in aspects such as dry braking and fuel efficiency.


In conclusion, the Continental PremiumContact 6 emerges as the better choice for drivers prioritizing exceptional handling and braking capabilities with excellent performance in wet conditions. Conversely, the Michelin Primacy 4 is a more suitable option for motorists seeking fuel efficiency combined with remarkable dry braking and driving comfort.

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 6
Michelin
Primacy 4
Hankook
Ventus Prime3 K125
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Firestone
Roadhawk
Number of tests
36
20
22
11
21
Best position
#1
#1
#1
#1
#2
Average position
3.1
3.5
4.9
11.6
11.9
Latest test
2023
2022
2022
2024
2024
Available sizes
296
384
161
121
164

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
70%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Michelin Primacy 4
77%
Michelin
Primacy 4
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
79%
Hankook
Ventus Prime3 K125
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Wet Braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
96%
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
96%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Wet Handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Michelin Primacy 4
67%
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
84%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
59%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Continental PremiumContact 6
57%
Michelin Primacy 4
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
66%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
76%
Aquaplaning Cross
Continental PremiumContact 6
51%
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
69%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Dry Performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Michelin Primacy 4
68%
Michelin
Primacy 4
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
94%
Hankook
Ventus Prime3 K125
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Firestone Roadhawk
84%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Dry Braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Michelin Primacy 4
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
95%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
76%
Dry Handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Michelin Primacy 4
59%
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
92%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
59%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Comfort & Noise
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Michelin Primacy 4
82%
Michelin
Primacy 4
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
73%
Hankook
Ventus Prime3 K125
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
82%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Firestone Roadhawk
63%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Noise Exterior
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
81%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Ride Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
64%
Michelin Primacy 4
82%
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
64%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Economy
Continental PremiumContact 6
70%
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Michelin
Primacy 4
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
59%
Hankook
Ventus Prime3 K125
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Firestone Roadhawk
55%
Firestone
Roadhawk
Rolling Resistance
Continental PremiumContact 6
55%
Michelin Primacy 4
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
71%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
63%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Michelin Primacy 4
92%
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
46%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
53%
Firestone Roadhawk
46%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2021205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison