18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Michelin Primacy 4 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

In this comparison, we will delve into the details of two summer tyres: the Continental PremiumContact 6 and the Michelin Primacy 4. Both tyres have been well-received in various tests and boast a 90% rating in our evaluation. The PremiumContact 6 replaced the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 while the Primacy 4 replaced the Michelin Primacy 3.


Continental PremiumContact 6 showcased impressive performance in multiple tests. It secured the 2nd position in Promobil, 2nd position in ADAC, and 1st position in Autozeitung. The tyre excelled in various aspects such as wet braking, wet circle cornering, dry braking, and handling, both objectively and subjectively. It was praised for being a well-balanced tyre with no major weaknesses, providing good performance on wet and dry roads, and a low fuel consumption.


On the other hand, the Michelin Primacy 4 also achieved commendable positions in tests, including 1st place in Teknikens and 2nd position in Autozeitung. This tyre demonstrated exceptional performance in dry braking, fuel efficiency, comfort, and wet handling. However, it displayed slight weaknesses on wet roads when put to the test by ADAC, which led to a minor downgrade. Nevertheless, it scored top marks for wear and dry handling.


Comparing their positions in mutual tests, the Continental PremiumContact 6 proved to be the stronger contender, particularly in the wet and overall performance. It provides better wet braking and handling, which are crucial in summer conditions. The Michelin Primacy 4, however, scored higher in aspects such as dry braking and fuel efficiency.


In conclusion, the Continental PremiumContact 6 emerges as the better choice for drivers prioritizing exceptional handling and braking capabilities with excellent performance in wet conditions. Conversely, the Michelin Primacy 4 is a more suitable option for motorists seeking fuel efficiency combined with remarkable dry braking and driving comfort.

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 6
Michelin
Primacy 4
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
36
20
3
5
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.1
3.5
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2023
2022
2025
2025
Available sizes
296
384
34
63

Wet

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin Primacy 4
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Michelin Primacy 4
59%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Michelin Primacy 4
77%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet circle cornering
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet side guide
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Michelin Primacy 4
68%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Wet performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Michelin Primacy 4
80%

Dry

Dry
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Michelin Primacy 4
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry driving behavior
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Dry steering response
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Dry lane changing
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Michelin Primacy 4
90%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Michelin Primacy 4
90%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin Primacy 4
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Interior noise
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Michelin Primacy 4
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Offroad

Offroad
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Sand traction
Continental PremiumContact 6
86%
Michelin Primacy 4
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
80%
Grass traction
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Handling on gravel
Continental PremiumContact 6
93%
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
76%
Gravel traction
Continental PremiumContact 6
65%
Michelin Primacy 4
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Mud traction
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Michelin Primacy 4
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
76%

Costs

Costs
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Michelin Primacy 4
93%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Fuel efficiency
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
Price/value
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison