18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Maxxis Premitra HP5 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

The Continental PremiumContact 6 is an excellent choice, scoring a commendable 92% in our rating system. Crafted by reputable tyre manufacturer, Continental, these summer tyres are designed with an emphasis on dry braking, dry handling, wet braking, and wet circle cornering. According to multiple test results, the PremiumContact 6 repeatedly shines in these areas, securing leading positions in the Autobild, ADAC, and Autozeitung tests.


Its predecessor, the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5, was already a high-performing tyre in its own right. However, the PremiumContact 6 has managed to further refine the formula with notable advancements in dry handling and wet braking. Note that the PremiumContact 6 has been replaced by the Continental PremiumContact 7, which you might want to consider for additional features and improvements.


On the other hand, the Maxxis Premitra HP5 offers a decent performance with a 76% rating in our system. Manufactured by Maxxis, known for its high-quality tyres, the Premitra HP5 is a summer tyre that excels in aquaplaning resistance (both cross and longitudinal), dry handling, and wet circle cornering. These strengths have earned the Premitra HP5 respectable positions in multiple tests.


During the GTÜ test, the Premitra HP5 was remarkable for its handling, scoring a higher position (4th) than the PremiumContact 6 (6th). In the Autozeitung and ACE tests, it also showed notable prowess in dry handling. However, the tyre's performance during the Automotorsport test was lacking, achieving the last position in the test.


To sum up, the Continental PremiumContact 6 and the Maxxis Premitra HP5 both have their strengths and weaknesses. The PremiumContact 6 is a high-rated tyre with excellent dry and wet performance. It has consistently scored high in various tests, solidifying its reputation as a reliable summer tyre.


The Premitra HP5, on the other hand, offers good value with its aquaplaning resistance and dry handling. While it doesn't score as high as the PremiumContact 6 in certain tests, it's still a commendable choice for those focusing on aquaplaning safety and handling performance.

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 6
Maxxis
Premitra HP5
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
36
31
6
15
Best position
#1
#1
#3
#2
Average position
3.1
9.5
4.7
9.0
Latest test
2023
2024
2026
2025
Available sizes
296
64
146
225

Wet

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet side guide
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
61%
Wet performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%

Dry

Dry
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Dry driving behavior
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Dry lane changing
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Dry steering response
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
88%
Dry performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
58%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Interior noise
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%

Offroad

Offroad
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Mud traction
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Sand traction
Continental PremiumContact 6
86%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Grass traction
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Handling on gravel
Continental PremiumContact 6
93%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Gravel traction
Continental PremiumContact 6
65%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
78%

Costs

Costs
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rolling resistance
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
54%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Fuel efficiency
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Price/value
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Maxxis Premitra HP5
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison