18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

In the world of tyres, the Continental PremiumContact 6 and the Kumho Ecsta PS71 are two popular summer tyre choices for consumers. Both are well-reputed products from their respective manufacturers, Continental and Kumho, and have been thoroughly tested by various organisations for their performance, safety, and longevity.


The Continental PremiumContact 6 is the successor of the legacy line, replacing the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5. This touring tyre is made in Slovakia, Germany, and the Czech Republic and is rated at 90% by our experts.


On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 is a summer tyre that does not have any predecessor or direct replacement. Its rating from our experts stands at 79%, making it a reliable choice for various weather conditions.


Comparing these two tyres based on mutual tests positions and overall performance, we can observe the following data:



  • ADAC Test: The Continental PremiumContact 6 ranked 1st among 16 tested tyres, impressing with its wet circle cornering, wet handling, and mileage. Meanwhile, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 secured the 10th position with its aquaplaning resistance, both cross and longitudinal.

  • Autobild Test: In this test with 53 total tyres, the Continental PremiumContact 6 achieved the 8th position, showcasing its dry handling, mileage, and price/value ratio. The Kumho Ecsta PS71 came in at 18th place.

  • ACE Test: Out of 11 tested tyres, the Continental PremiumContact 6 took 5th place, primarily due to its dry driving behavior. The Kumho Ecsta PS71 surpassed expectations, coming in at 2nd place, demonstrating excellent aquaplaning resistance and minimal exterior noise.


To summarise, the Continental PremiumContact 6 excels in wet conditions, offering outstanding wet circle cornering, wet handling, and wet braking capabilities. It is also highly energy efficient, providing a reduced fuel consumption rate. On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 delivers a balanced performance on both wet and dry surfaces, with excellent aquaplaning resistance and reduced exterior noise.


Both tyres have their unique strengths and weaknesses, but overall, the Continental PremiumContact 6 comes ahead in most of the mutual tests, making it a better choice for those seeking a versatile and reliable summer tyre.

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 6
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
36
15
13
3
Best position
#1
#2
#3
#2
Average position
3.1
9.0
6.6
3.3
Latest test
2023
2025
2020
2026
Available sizes
296
225
75
60

Wet

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Wet handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Wet side guide
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
96%
Wet performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
70%

Dry

Dry
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Dry driving behavior
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
61%
Dry lane changing
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
95%
Dry steering response
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
90%
Dry performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
70%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Interior noise
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
69%

Offroad

Offroad
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%

Costs

Costs
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
55%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
42%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Fuel efficiency
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
76%
Price/value
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
57%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison