18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Continental PremiumContact 5

Today, we'll look into the comparison of two reputable summer tyres, Continental PremiumContact 6 and Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127. These tyres are manufactured by Continental and Hankook respectively.


The Continental PremiumContact 6 is a touring summer tyre with an overall rating of 90% on our site. It is made in the Czech Republic, Germany, and Slovakia, and it falls under the touring sub-type category. The older Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 has been replaced by the Continental PremiumContact 7.


On the other side, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 is an ultra-high-performance (UUHP) summer tyre with an overall rating of 87%. Designed in Korea, it is also the first equipment for some Audi and BMW models.


Autobild tests in 2021 ranked Continental PremiumContact 6 at the 8th position out of 53 tested tyres, with its best features being dry braking, dry handling, mileage, and price/value ratio. Meanwhile, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 secured the 3rd place, excelling in dry braking.


In AutoMotorSport's tests, Continental PremiumContact 6 achieved the 4th position out of 10 tested tyres, with its best features being its comfort and dry steering response. The Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 occupied the 3rd place in the same tests, performing well in dry lane changing, wet handling, and wet braking.


During the tests conducted by Autozeitung, the Continental PremiumContact 6 ranked 2nd out of 10 tyres, with dry handling being its best feature. Contrarily, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 ranked 9th in these tests.


ADAC testing ranks Continental PremiumContact 6 at the top (1st) out of 16 tyres, excelling in wet handling, wet circle cornering, and wet braking. On the other hand, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 placed 14th in these tests.


Strengths and Weaknesses
Continental PremiumContact 6:
+ Dry braking, dry handling, mileage, and price/value ratio
- Limited aquaplaning safety reserves, slow steering responses, and extended wet braking distances


Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127:
+ Dry braking, secure wet and dry handling, and low rolling resistance
- Limited safety reserves in curve aquaplaning and slower steering responses


In conclusion, both the Continental PremiumContact 6 and Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 are highly regarded summer tyres, each having its strengths and weaknesses. The Continental PremiumContact 6 seems to have a slight overall edge, ranking higher in most tests, offering better dry handling and fuel efficiency. However, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 shows excellent performance in wet conditions and dry braking, making it suitable for drivers who prioritize wet handling capabilities.

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 6
Hankook
Ventus S1 evo3 K127
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport Evo
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Continental
PremiumContact 5
Number of tests
36
19
2
23
26
2
Best position
#1
#1
#3
#1
#1
#5
Average position
3.1
6.1
7.0
3.3
2.2
6.0
Latest test
2023
2025
2026
2025
2026
2021
Available sizes
296
109
92
188
66
74

Wet

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
79%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Continental PremiumContact 5
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
76%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
67%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Wet braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
90%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
97%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Continental PremiumContact 5
55%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
62%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
45%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Continental PremiumContact 5
70%
Wet handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
84%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
76%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Continental PremiumContact 5
75%
Wet circle cornering
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
78%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet side guide
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
80%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
94%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Continental PremiumContact 5
62%

Dry

Dry
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
81%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
90%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Dry braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
89%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
97%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Continental PremiumContact 5
50%
Dry handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
81%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
88%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Continental PremiumContact 5
72%
Dry driving behavior
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
83%
Dry steering response
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
75%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Continental PremiumContact 5
92%
Dry lane changing
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
94%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
75%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Continental PremiumContact 5
100%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
76%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
38%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Exterior noise
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
78%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
38%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
81%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Interior noise
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
79%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Offroad

Offroad
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
82%

Costs

Costs
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
69%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
61%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Rolling resistance
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
73%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
61%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
58%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
62%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Price/value
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
71%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison