18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Continental PremiumContact 6Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 6

7.6
R15 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Firestone Roadhawk 2Upper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
36
3
1
6
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#3
Average position
3.1
3.3
1.0
4.7
Latest test
2023
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
296
40
64
146

Wet

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Wet handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Wet circle cornering
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Wet side guide
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Wet performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
70%

Dry

Dry
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Dry handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Dry driving behavior
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry steering response
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Dry lane changing
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Dry performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
58%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Interior noise
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Offroad

Offroad
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%

Costs

Costs
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolling resistance
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Fuel efficiency
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Price/value
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison