18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 5 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 5
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
2
10
3
5
Best position
#5
#2
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
6.0
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2021
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
74
104
34
63

Wet

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 5
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet braking
Continental PremiumContact 5
55%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental PremiumContact 5
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet handling
Continental PremiumContact 5
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%

Dry

Dry
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Continental PremiumContact 5
50%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Continental PremiumContact 5
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Costs

Costs
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison