18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 5 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 5
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
2
6
3
1
Best position
#5
#3
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
4.7
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2021
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
74
146
34
64

Wet

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 5
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Continental PremiumContact 5
55%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental PremiumContact 5
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet handling
Continental PremiumContact 5
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Dry

Dry
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Continental PremiumContact 5
50%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Continental PremiumContact 5
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Costs

Costs
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison