18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 5 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Continental PremiumContact 5Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 5

R14 – R17
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Firestone Roadhawk 2Upper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 5
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
2
3
6
Best position
#5
#2
#3
Average position
6.0
3.7
4.7
Latest test
2021
2025
2026
Available sizes
74
34
146

Wet

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 5
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Wet braking
Continental PremiumContact 5
55%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental PremiumContact 5
70%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Wet handling
Continental PremiumContact 5
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%

Dry

Dry
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry lane changing
Continental PremiumContact 5
100%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Dry braking
Continental PremiumContact 5
50%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Dry handling
Continental PremiumContact 5
72%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Costs

Costs
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolling resistance
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison