18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 5 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Continental PremiumContact 5Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 5

R14 – R17
BFGoodrich AdvantageUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Kumho Ecsta PS71Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta PS71

8.3
R16 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 5
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
2
14
15
Best position
#5
#8
#2
Average position
6.0
13.4
9.0
Latest test
2021
2026
2025
Available sizes
74
153
225

Wet

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 5
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet braking
Continental PremiumContact 5
55%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental PremiumContact 5
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet handling
Continental PremiumContact 5
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%

Dry

Dry
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry handling
Continental PremiumContact 5
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Dry braking
Continental PremiumContact 5
50%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 5
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Exterior noise
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Costs

Costs
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Rolling resistance
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison