18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
5
2
3
3
14
Best position
#7
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
2.0
3.3
3.7
3.6
Latest test
2022
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
675
48
40
34
188

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet performance
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry driving behavior
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Dry lane changing
Continental EcoContact 6
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Dry performance
Continental EcoContact 6
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Interior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison