18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Nexen N Fera Primus vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Nexen
N Fera Primus
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Number of tests
5
6
8
Best position
#7
#10
#4
Average position
13.0
12.7
12.8
Latest test
2022
2024
2024
Available sizes
676
60
30

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Nexen N Fera Primus
73%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
65%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Nexen N Fera Primus
64%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Nexen N Fera Primus
77%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
83%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Nexen N Fera Primus
76%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
63%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Nexen N Fera Primus
70%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Nexen N Fera Primus
79%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Nexen N Fera Primus
62%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
74%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Nexen N Fera Primus
72%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
78%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Nexen N Fera Primus
53%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Nexen N Fera Primus
65%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Nexen N Fera Primus
66%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Nexen N Fera Primus
76%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Interior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
Nexen N Fera Primus
71%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
81%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Nexen N Fera Primus
59%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Nexen N Fera Primus
49%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
82%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Nexen N Fera Primus
59%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison