18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
4
18
3
1
3
3
Best position
#7
#3
#1
#2
#1
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
12.0
6.1
3.3
1.0
3.7
3.7
Latest test
2022
2025
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
676
111
47
40
64
34
34

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Continental EcoContact 6
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison