18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
5
3
1
Best position
#7
#4
#1
Average position
13.0
4.3
1.0
Latest test
2022
2025
2025
Available sizes
676
97
64

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison