Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Premium

Continental

EcoContact 6

R13 – R23

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak LM-005

8.2

R14 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

EcoContact 6

WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak LM-005

Number of tests

5

3

49

Best position

#7

#4

#1

Average position

13.0

4.3

3.2

Latest test

2022

2025

2024

Available sizes

676

97

213

Wet

Continental EcoContact 6

60%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Wet circle cornering

Continental EcoContact 6

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Wet handling

Continental EcoContact 6

57%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Aquaplaning - cross

Continental EcoContact 6

40%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Wet braking

Continental EcoContact 6

66%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Continental EcoContact 6

61%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Dry

Continental EcoContact 6

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Dry braking

Continental EcoContact 6

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Dry handling

Continental EcoContact 6

70%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Dry driving behavior

Continental EcoContact 6

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

Dry lane changing

Continental EcoContact 6

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

80%

Dry performance

Continental EcoContact 6

86%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

Comfort

Continental EcoContact 6

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Exterior noise

Continental EcoContact 6

85%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Comfort

Continental EcoContact 6

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Interior noise

Continental EcoContact 6

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

Costs

Continental EcoContact 6

93%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Fuel efficiency

Continental EcoContact 6

99%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Mileage

Continental EcoContact 6

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Rolling resistance

Continental EcoContact 6

100%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Price/value

Continental EcoContact 6

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

EcoContact 6

WinterCraft WP52+

Blizzak LM-005

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison