Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Continental

EcoContact 6

R13 – R23

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

EcoContact 6

Ecsta HS52

ION Evo

Number of tests

5

10

1

Best position

#7

#2

#1

Average position

13.0

6.0

1.0

Latest test

2022

2026

2025

Available sizes

676

104

64

Wet

Continental EcoContact 6

60%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet braking

Continental EcoContact 6

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet circle cornering

Continental EcoContact 6

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet handling

Continental EcoContact 6

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Continental EcoContact 6

40%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Continental EcoContact 6

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Dry

Continental EcoContact 6

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Continental EcoContact 6

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Continental EcoContact 6

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Comfort

Continental EcoContact 6

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Continental EcoContact 6

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Costs

Continental EcoContact 6

93%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Mileage

Continental EcoContact 6

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Rolling resistance

Continental EcoContact 6

100%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook ION Evo

EcoContact 6

Ecsta HS52

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison