18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Fulda EcoControl HP2

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Number of tests
5
10
8
Best position
#7
#2
#4
Average position
13.0
6.0
12.8
Latest test
2022
2026
2024
Available sizes
676
104
30

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
65%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
63%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
74%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
78%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
67%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Interior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
81%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
82%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison