18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Continental EcoContact 6Premium
ContinentalContinental

EcoContact 6

R13 – R23
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Firestone Roadhawk 2Upper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3) Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
5
10
6
Best position
#7
#2
#3
Average position
13.0
6.0
4.7
Latest test
2022
2026
2026
Available sizes
676
104
146

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison