18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Continental EcoContact 6Premium
ContinentalContinental

EcoContact 6

R13 – R23
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
10
3
Best position
#7
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
6.0
3.7
Latest test
2022
2026
2025
Available sizes
676
104
34

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison