18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
EcoContact 6
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
11
3
18
3
Best position
#7
#1
#2
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
11.6
3.3
6.1
3.7
Latest test
2022
2024
2026
2024
2025
Available sizes
676
121
40
47
34

Wet

Wet
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Dry

Dry
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Continental EcoContact 6
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Comfort
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%

Costs

Costs
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Fuel efficiency
Continental EcoContact 6
99%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Mileage
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Price/value
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison